Azkali grammar: Difference between revisions

Line 65: Line 65:
| -eti
| -eti
|-
|-
!Instrument
!Instrumental
| -gez
| -gez
| -ez
| -ez
Line 360: Line 360:
|+Forms of ''itu''
|+Forms of ''itu''
! colspan="3" |Singular
! colspan="3" |Singular
! colspan="3" |Dual
! colspan="3" |Paucal
! colspan="3" |Plural
! colspan="3" |Plural
|-
|-
Line 431: Line 431:
!Soft
!Soft
| colspan="2" |itho
| colspan="2" |itho
|}
==== ''Huka'' ====
{| class="wikitable"
! colspan="2" |
!1p, 2p, 3p singular
!1p, 2p, 3p plural
|-
! rowspan="3" |Indicative
!Far past
| colspan="2" | hesak
|-
!Past
| rotz
| rezi
|-
!Non past
| huka
| hezi
|-
! rowspan="3" |Conditional
!Far past
| colspan="2" | hez
|-
!Past
| colspan="2" | heintz
|-
!Non past
| colspan="2" | irahintz
|-
! rowspan="3" |Hypothetical
!Far past
| colspan="2" | usak
|-
!Past
| colspan="2" | utz
|-
!Non past
| colspan="2" | una
|-
! rowspan="2" |Imperative
!Hard
| colspan="2" |huka
|-
!Soft
| colspan="2" |uha
|}
|}


Line 448: Line 494:
* ''hataiz huka (have lost)''
* ''hataiz huka (have lost)''
* ''patzegi huka (have worked)''
* ''patzegi huka (have worked)''
|Particularly in Southern Azkali dialects, this form has been reanalyzed as a sort of near past
|Particularly in Southern Azkali dialects, this form has been reanalyzed as a sort of near past tense. Consequently, The already existing near past form is used as a general past tense
tense. Consequently, The already existing near past form is used as a general past tense
alongside the already conjugated past tense.
alongside the already conjugated past tense.
|-
|-
Line 533: Line 578:
|-
|-
!Negative volition
!Negative volition
|present participle + ''ketz'' + ''nasa (to complete)''
|present participle + ''ketz'' + infinitive of ''nasa (to complete)''
|
|
* ''huka ketz te nasa (don't want to do)''
* ''huka ketz te nasa (don't want to do)''