Pataxea: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


== History ==
== History ==
There is no direct evidence of the existance of Proto-Azkali as a language.
Throughout early Azkali history, there has been hundreds of references 


== Phonology ==
== Phonology ==
Line 43: Line 43:
!<small>voiced</small>
!<small>voiced</small>
|'''*b'''
|'''*b'''
/b~p'/
/p'~b/
|'''*d'''
|'''*d'''
/d-t'/
/t'~d/
|
|
|'''*g'''
|'''*g'''
/g~k'/
/k'~g/
|
|
|-
|-
Line 66: Line 66:
|
|
|'''*z'''
|'''*z'''
/z~s'/
/s'~z/
|
|
|
|
Line 438: Line 438:
|49
|49
|snake
|snake
|
|*ezaze
|
|(possibly onomatopoeic)
|
|tzatzu
|-
|-
|50
|50
|worm
|worm
|*zordaxe
|
|
|
|tzoradhei
|
|-
|-
|51
|51