Pataxea: Difference between revisions
imported>Photosynthesis bisectors |
imported>Photosynthesis bisectors |
||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
Proto-Azkali had a split-ergative morphosyntactical alignment. In the future and present tenses, the nominative and accusative cases were used; in past tenses, the ergative case was used, and the accusative case acted as the absolutive case. Case marking appeared to have been conveyed via particles, shown below: | Proto-Azkali had a split-ergative morphosyntactical alignment. In the future and present tenses, the nominative and accusative cases were used; in past tenses, the ergative case was used, and the accusative case acted as the absolutive case. Case marking appeared to have been conveyed via particles, shown below: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+Proto | |+Proto-Azkali case | ||
!Nominative | !Nominative | ||
|Ø | |Ø | ||